← Back to Home 📄 Display JSON

📝 Ubuntu System Plan of Action and Milestones - FedRAMP High

Plan of Action and Milestones for Remediation Tracking

POA&M Information

Referenced System Security Plan

SSP Location: trestle://system-security-plans/Ubuntu-System-ssp-fedramp-high/system-security-plan.json

Findings (46)

Control ac-1 assessment outcome

Control ac-1 is partially-satisfied based on 20 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-1
Target: Control ac-1

Control ac-10 assessment outcome

Control ac-10 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-10
Target: Control ac-10

Control ac-11 assessment outcome

Control ac-11 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-11
Target: Control ac-11

Control ac-11.1 assessment outcome

Control ac-11.1 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-11.1
Target: Control ac-11.1

Control ac-12 assessment outcome

Control ac-12 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-12
Target: Control ac-12

Control ac-17.1 assessment outcome

Control ac-17.1 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-17.1
Target: Control ac-17.1

Control ac-17.2 assessment outcome

Control ac-17.2 is partially-satisfied based on 14 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-17.2
Target: Control ac-17.2

Control ac-2 assessment outcome

Control ac-2 is partially-satisfied based on 20 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-2
Target: Control ac-2

Control ac-2.1 assessment outcome

Control ac-2.1 is partially-satisfied based on 20 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-2.1
Target: Control ac-2.1

Control ac-2.3 assessment outcome

Control ac-2.3 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-2.3
Target: Control ac-2.3

Control ac-2.5 assessment outcome

Control ac-2.5 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-2.5
Target: Control ac-2.5

Control ac-3 assessment outcome

Control ac-3 is partially-satisfied based on 96 passing and 12 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-3
Target: Control ac-3

Control ac-4.4 assessment outcome

Control ac-4.4 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-4.4
Target: Control ac-4.4

Control ac-5 assessment outcome

Control ac-5 is partially-satisfied based on 96 passing and 12 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-5
Target: Control ac-5

Control ac-6 assessment outcome

Control ac-6 is partially-satisfied based on 96 passing and 12 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-6
Target: Control ac-6

Control ac-6.1 assessment outcome

Control ac-6.1 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-6.1
Target: Control ac-6.1

Control ac-6.2 assessment outcome

Control ac-6.2 is partially-satisfied based on 31 passing and 5 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-6.2
Target: Control ac-6.2

Control ac-6.5 assessment outcome

Control ac-6.5 is partially-satisfied based on 31 passing and 5 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ac-6.5
Target: Control ac-6.5

Control au-12 assessment outcome

Control au-12 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 14 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-12
Target: Control au-12

Control au-3 assessment outcome

Control au-3 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 8 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-3
Target: Control au-3

Control au-3.1 assessment outcome

Control au-3.1 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 8 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-3.1
Target: Control au-3.1

Control au-5.1 assessment outcome

Control au-5.1 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-5.1
Target: Control au-5.1

Control au-5.2 assessment outcome

Control au-5.2 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-5.2
Target: Control au-5.2

Control au-6.1 assessment outcome

Control au-6.1 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-6.1
Target: Control au-6.1

Control au-6.4 assessment outcome

Control au-6.4 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-6.4
Target: Control au-6.4

Control au-7 assessment outcome

Control au-7 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 14 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-7
Target: Control au-7

Control au-9.2 assessment outcome

Control au-9.2 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-9.2
Target: Control au-9.2

Control au-9.3 assessment outcome

Control au-9.3 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: au-9.3
Target: Control au-9.3

Control cm-1 assessment outcome

Control cm-1 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: cm-1
Target: Control cm-1

Control cm-2 assessment outcome

Control cm-2 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: cm-2
Target: Control cm-2

Control cm-6 assessment outcome

Control cm-6 is partially-satisfied based on 9 passing and 3 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: cm-6
Target: Control cm-6

Control cm-7 assessment outcome

Control cm-7 is partially-satisfied based on 9 passing and 3 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: cm-7
Target: Control cm-7

Control cm-7.1 assessment outcome

Control cm-7.1 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: cm-7.1
Target: Control cm-7.1

Control cm-9 assessment outcome

Control cm-9 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: cm-9
Target: Control cm-9

Control ia-5 assessment outcome

Control ia-5 is partially-satisfied based on 14 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ia-5
Target: Control ia-5

Control ia-5.1 assessment outcome

Control ia-5.1 is partially-satisfied based on 179 passing and 31 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: ia-5.1
Target: Control ia-5.1

Control mp-2 assessment outcome

Control mp-2 is partially-satisfied based on 96 passing and 12 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: mp-2
Target: Control mp-2

Control sa-10 assessment outcome

Control sa-10 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sa-10
Target: Control sa-10

Control sa-3 assessment outcome

Control sa-3 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sa-3
Target: Control sa-3

Control sa-8 assessment outcome

Control sa-8 is partially-satisfied based on 4 passing and 2 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sa-8
Target: Control sa-8

Control sc-28 assessment outcome

Control sc-28 is partially-satisfied based on 21 passing and 3 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sc-28
Target: Control sc-28

Control sc-28.1 assessment outcome

Control sc-28.1 is partially-satisfied based on 21 passing and 3 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sc-28.1
Target: Control sc-28.1

Control sc-8 assessment outcome

Control sc-8 is partially-satisfied based on 14 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sc-8
Target: Control sc-8

Control sc-8.1 assessment outcome

Control sc-8.1 is partially-satisfied based on 14 passing and 4 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: sc-8.1
Target: Control sc-8.1

Control si-2.2 assessment outcome

Control si-2.2 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: si-2.2
Target: Control si-2.2

Control si-4.2 assessment outcome

Control si-4.2 is partially-satisfied based on 5 passing and 1 failing mapped XCCDF rule evaluations across 6 assessed subjects.

Target Type: FindingTargetTypeValidValues.objective_id
Target ID: si-4.2
Target: Control si-4.2

POA&M Items (46)

Remediate ac-1

Address non-compliance for control ac-1 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ac-1 Failures: 4

Remediate ac-10

Address non-compliance for control ac-10 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-10 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-11

Address non-compliance for control ac-11 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-11 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-11.1

Address non-compliance for control ac-11.1 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-11.1 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-12

Address non-compliance for control ac-12 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-12 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-17.1

Address non-compliance for control ac-17.1 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-17.1 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-17.2

Address non-compliance for control ac-17.2 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ac-17.2 Failures: 4

Remediate ac-2

Address non-compliance for control ac-2 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ac-2 Failures: 4

Remediate ac-2.1

Address non-compliance for control ac-2.1 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ac-2.1 Failures: 4

Remediate ac-2.3

Address non-compliance for control ac-2.3 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-2.3 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-2.5

Address non-compliance for control ac-2.5 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-2.5 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-3

Address non-compliance for control ac-3 with 12 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: ac-3 Failures: 12

Remediate ac-4.4

Address non-compliance for control ac-4.4 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-4.4 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-5

Address non-compliance for control ac-5 with 12 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: ac-5 Failures: 12

Remediate ac-6

Address non-compliance for control ac-6 with 12 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: ac-6 Failures: 12

Remediate ac-6.1

Address non-compliance for control ac-6.1 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: ac-6.1 Failures: 1

Remediate ac-6.2

Address non-compliance for control ac-6.2 with 5 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ac-6.2 Failures: 5

Remediate ac-6.5

Address non-compliance for control ac-6.5 with 5 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ac-6.5 Failures: 5

Remediate au-12

Address non-compliance for control au-12 with 14 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: au-12 Failures: 14

Remediate au-3

Address non-compliance for control au-3 with 8 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: au-3 Failures: 8

Remediate au-3.1

Address non-compliance for control au-3.1 with 8 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: au-3.1 Failures: 8

Remediate au-5.1

Address non-compliance for control au-5.1 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: au-5.1 Failures: 1

Remediate au-5.2

Address non-compliance for control au-5.2 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: au-5.2 Failures: 2

Remediate au-6.1

Address non-compliance for control au-6.1 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: au-6.1 Failures: 1

Remediate au-6.4

Address non-compliance for control au-6.4 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: au-6.4 Failures: 2

Remediate au-7

Address non-compliance for control au-7 with 14 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: au-7 Failures: 14

Remediate au-9.2

Address non-compliance for control au-9.2 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: au-9.2 Failures: 1

Remediate au-9.3

Address non-compliance for control au-9.3 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: au-9.3 Failures: 1

Remediate cm-1

Address non-compliance for control cm-1 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: cm-1 Failures: 2

Remediate cm-2

Address non-compliance for control cm-2 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: cm-2 Failures: 2

Remediate cm-6

Address non-compliance for control cm-6 with 3 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: cm-6 Failures: 3

Remediate cm-7

Address non-compliance for control cm-7 with 3 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: cm-7 Failures: 3

Remediate cm-7.1

Address non-compliance for control cm-7.1 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: cm-7.1 Failures: 2

Remediate cm-9

Address non-compliance for control cm-9 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: cm-9 Failures: 2

Remediate ia-5

Address non-compliance for control ia-5 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: ia-5 Failures: 4

Remediate ia-5.1

Address non-compliance for control ia-5.1 with 31 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: ia-5.1 Failures: 31

Remediate mp-2

Address non-compliance for control mp-2 with 12 failing rule evaluations

Priority: HIGH Control: mp-2 Failures: 12

Remediate sa-10

Address non-compliance for control sa-10 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: sa-10 Failures: 2

Remediate sa-3

Address non-compliance for control sa-3 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: sa-3 Failures: 2

Remediate sa-8

Address non-compliance for control sa-8 with 2 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: sa-8 Failures: 2

Remediate sc-28

Address non-compliance for control sc-28 with 3 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: sc-28 Failures: 3

Remediate sc-28.1

Address non-compliance for control sc-28.1 with 3 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: sc-28.1 Failures: 3

Remediate sc-8

Address non-compliance for control sc-8 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: sc-8 Failures: 4

Remediate sc-8.1

Address non-compliance for control sc-8.1 with 4 failing rule evaluations

Priority: MEDIUM Control: sc-8.1 Failures: 4

Remediate si-2.2

Address non-compliance for control si-2.2 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: si-2.2 Failures: 1

Remediate si-4.2

Address non-compliance for control si-4.2 with 1 failing rule evaluations

Priority: LOW Control: si-4.2 Failures: 1